After releasing it a few days ago, Rob White from
http://www.jacquelinewhite.co.uk/ wrote us that he had problems validating his site. Checking that issue, we found out that the default namespace on Robs sitemap is different than what we expected. During this bug fix, some other issues came up and we decided to release version 1.1 of our tool. The update includes:
-
Sitemap.xml default namespace bug fix.
-
Error Handling - Better feedback to the user and cancellation of the validation process.
-
Remove white spaces from the sitemap file name (otherwise, the validation will fail).
Subscribe to our feed and download your copy of the Xhtml Validator Software/Source code
Liked this post? Please Share:
Tags :
.NetApplicationInvalidSOAPToolValidValidateValidatorWPFXHTML
Rob White
Said on May 24, 2008 :
Thanks for the fix, it nows works like a chram.
Rahul
Said on October 1, 2008 :
Where can I download this application?
Amit
Said on October 1, 2008 :
it is in the freebies page, If you subscribe to our feed you will get the password at the bottom
Ryan Williams
Said on December 11, 2008 :
Hiya,
Great application. I can’t believe there’s so little in the way of this type of thing out there to be honest, as validating an entire site is clearly very important.
Would it be possible for a future version to not require you have the sitemap online to do its stuff? I tried to use a local path in the URL bar (eg: C:\Desktop\Sitemap.xml) and it simply rejected it, asking for a proper URL instead.
Shahar Y
Said on December 12, 2008 :
@ Ryan Williams
Will be done. The new version will be released soon, so stay tuned
Ryan Williams
Said on May 11, 2009 :
Hi,
Any plans to update this application? I still find it invaluable, as there literally seems to be nothing else of note out there and it would be great if some minor usability issues like having to upload the sitemaps could be addressed.
Shahar Y
Said on May 12, 2009 :
@ Ryan Williams
I can’t figure out what pages to validate if I don’t have the site map. What alternative did you have in mind?